The NRI Money Myth
This article touches on tax and immigration topics for general context only — it is not tax or legal advice. Rules vary by individual situation; consult a qualified CA or immigration attorney for yours.
"Must be nice." That's usually how it comes up — a cousin back home, a friend from college, sometimes even a sibling. You're in the US, you clearly make good money, so the assumption follows automatically: you're set. Whatever you send home is extra. Whatever you spend here is disposable.
Most NRIs I've talked to have heard some version of this. And most of them let it go, because arguing about your own finances feels tacky. But the assumption is wrong often enough that it's worth actually saying so.
The income is real. The math around it is not what people think.
India received more in remittances last year than any other country in the world receives — over $135 billion, according to the World Bank, with projections putting this year even higher. That's not a Gulf-labor statistic anymore, either. The single largest source of that money is now the United States, not the Gulf — a shift from a decade ago, when Gulf countries dominated. A meaningful share of the "must be nice" money is coming from exactly the kind of household that gets accused of having it easy: US-based tech, medicine, and finance professionals sending a steady stream of dollars back to India.
What that framing leaves out is everything sitting on top of the income.
Visa status is a tax on peace of mind. A large share of Indian professionals in the US are here on H-1B, and the reality of that visa is a green card backlog that can run into decades for Indian nationals specifically, because of per-country caps that don't apply the same way to other nationalities. Your spouse's ability to work is often tied to your visa status. Your ability to stay in the country at all is tied to your employer. None of that shows up in a salary number, and all of it shapes how a household actually thinks about risk, savings, and how much cushion feels like enough.
The obligations run in two currencies and two directions. A household clearing a comfortable US salary is often, in the same month, paying Bay Area or Seattle rent, saving for kids' college in dollars, sending money to aging parents in India, and keeping half an eye on a property or a loan back home that someone still has to manage. None of those things cancel each other out. They stack.
And the two-country part doesn't get easier with income. NRE and NRO accounts, FEMA rules on what you can and can't hold as a resident-turned-NRI, remittance limits, dual tax exposure depending on your situation — none of that complexity goes away because you're earning well. If anything, higher income means more of it to keep track of, not less.
None of this is a complaint. It's a fairly good problem to have, and most NRIs would say so themselves. But "must be nice" flattens a household that's actually managing real financial complexity across two countries into a single, simple number — and that's the part worth pushing back on, at least to yourself, the next time it comes up at a family gathering.
It's also, not coincidentally, why we built Rokada the way we did. A tool built for a US household's finances alone doesn't have a category for "sent to my mother's account for the contractor," and a spreadsheet doesn't scale to two currencies, two tax systems, and a family depending on both. If any of this sounded like your own year, you can see what that actually looks like tracked properly at rokada.app.